Robin Johansen

Senior Counsel

Robin B. Johansen is senior counsel with Olson Remcho.  She previously co-founded the law firm of Remcho Johansen & Purcell which merged with Olson Hagel & Fishburn LLP in January 2020 to form Olson Remcho.  Ms. Johansen was admitted to the California Bar in 1977 and the Bar of the District of Columbia in 1979.  She is a graduate of the University of Illinois (B.A., cum laude, 1968) and Stanford Law School (J.D., 1977).

Ms. Johansen was Senior Article Editor, Stanford Law Review, Volume 29, and is the author of “The New Federalism: Toward a Principled Interpretation of the State Constitution,” 29 Stanford Law Review 297, 1977 and “Searches and Seizures on Church Premises: Weighing the Privacy Rights of Religious Bodies” in Kelley, Government Intervention in Religious Affairs II.

Ms. Johansen is a member of the California Academy of Appellate Lawyers and appears on the Northern California Super Lawyers list.  She served on the Board of Directors of First Place for Youth, a statewide organization serving former foster youth and on the Board of Directors of Coro Northern California.  From 1992 to 1993, she was a member of the State Citizens’ Commission on Ballot Initiatives, and in 1974, Ms. Johansen was a research assistant to the U.S. House of Representatives’ Impeachment Inquiry staff.

Ms. Johansen has represented numerous local governmental entities on a variety of public policy issues and has worked extensively on matters involving the initiative and referendum process at both the state and local levels, and on matters of redistricting.  She has also represented a broad range of clients, including the California Legislature, the State Superintendent of Public Instruction and the State Controller, in public policy, school finance, and constitutional litigation in both state and federal courts.

Representative Highlights

Results described below were dependent on the facts of that particular case. Prior results do not guarantee or predict similar outcomes.

  • Lee v. City of Los Angeles, 88 F. Supp. 3d 1140 (C.D. Cal. 2015) (on appeal).  Successfully defended the City of Los Angeles’s 2012 Redistricting Ordinance against a lawsuit alleging that district boundaries violated the Federal and State Constitutions, and the Los Angeles City Charter.
  • Suever v. Connell, 579 F.3d 1047 (9th Cir. 2009).  Won reversal of district court’s ruling that would have required the State to pay interest on unclaimed property, while successfully defending district court victory that shields the State from exposure to an award of damages.
  • Friends of Bay Meadows v. City of San Mateo, 157 Cal. App. 4th 1175 (2007).   Successfully represented a private landowner in dispute over referendum petition.
  • Canatella v. Stovitz, 213 Fed. Appx. 515 (9th Cir. 2006).  Defended constitutionality of attorney discipline proceedings on behalf of the State Bar of California.
  • Independent Energy Producers Association v. McPherson, 38 Cal. 4th 1020 (2006).  Defended Proposition 80 in a case that now defines the standard for pre-election review of ballot measures.
  • Senate v. Jones, 21 Cal. 4th 1142 (1999).  Represented California Senate in successful challenge to the constitutionality of a statewide initiative.


  • University of Illinois, B.A., cum laude, 1968
  • Stanford Law School, J.D., 1977


  • California
  • District of Columbia